Answer : InfoPlus21 is process historian containing list of templates of different tag structure e.g. IP_AnalogDef, IP_DescreteDef, IP_TextDef etc. Based on process tags from DCS/OPC/Any other historian, the IP21 records are created and each record acts as a table in historian. ANS1: Aspentech software is only windows based compatibility however IP21 aspenONE Process Explorer is web based and therefore you can access it over any operating system using host url. ANS2: you can try SELECT statement to get data from IP21 Historian using it's end-user component SQLPlus or on excel add-ins. e.g. SELECT NAME, IP_DESCRIPTION, IP_PLANT_AREA, IP_ENG_UNITS FROM IP_ANALOGDEF RESULTS: I hope this help you understand better. Otherwise you need to first learn the structure of your IP21 historian tags to build the query e.g. If it has customized structure, then you have to build your own. Welcome in industrial-IT ! For these technology, the best option is the 'AspenTech...
Answer : Solution 1: As Tan Yong Boon stated, it is Bent’s Rule with which we can explain the lower bond angle of \ce N F 3 \ce{NF3} \ce NF 3 when compared to \ce N H 3 \ce{NH3} \ce N H 3 . The rule as stated by Henry Bent: Atomic s character concentrates in orbitals directed towards electropositive substituents. Fluorine is more electronegative that hydrogen, and the \ce N − F \ce{N−F} \ce N − F bond would have greater p character than the \ce N − H \ce{N−H} \ce N − H bond. And more s character leads to large bond angles. Thus, the bond angle is greater in \ce N H 3 \ce{NH3} \ce N H 3 than in \ce N F 3 \ce{NF3} \ce NF 3 . Now, consider \ce N C l 3 \ce{NCl3} \ce NCl 3 . Clearly, \ce C l \ce{Cl} \ce Cl atom islarger in size than the central atom, nitrogen. Hence the higher bond angle here is due to the steric crowding caused by \ce C l \ce{Cl} \ce Cl atoms.(More pronounced than the electrongativity of \ce C l \ce{Cl} \ce Cl atom). They repel eachother and hence b...
Answer : Very good question. Event handlers are executed in order of initialization. I haven't really thought about this before, because my handlers never needed to know which one run first, but by the look of you fiddle I can see that the handlers are called in the same order in which they are initialized. In you fiddle you have a controller controllerA which depends on two services, ServiceA and ServiceB : myModule .controller('ControllerA', [ '$scope', '$rootScope', 'ServiceA', 'ServiceB', function($scope, $rootScope, ServiceA, ServiceB) {...} ] ); Both services and the controller define an event listener. Now, all dependencies need to be resolved before being injected, which means that both services will be initialized before being injected into the controller. Thus, handlers defined in the services will be called first, because service factories are initialized before contro...
Comments
Post a Comment